how the world is changing Tuesday, May 29 2007 

I’ve been thinking about my previous post and how the world is changing.  Clearly Idaho’s gun laws as related to minors were written for a past era, a time when kids went hunting on the back 40 acres of the family farm.   Like most people I find it appalling that young men are walking around Post Falls armed, and (most especially) that their parents think this is okay.  Personally I consider guns dangerous and I’m not against gun control (just not exactly for it either).  One can imagine many dangerous scenarios and bad consequences to the actions of these young men.  However my guess is that not much will come of this except a certain amount of agitation between groups that advocate or oppose gun control.  It’s also possible that the consequence of the boy’s actions will have the opposite effect of what they advocate – citizens may very well campaign to change Idaho’s gun laws now that they are aware of them – something that I would probably support.  However, my feelings are also influenced by personal experience.   Having grown up in North Idaho and Eastern Montana during a time when it was common and normal for households to own and use firearms I have some sympathy for the boy’s worldview (just not their actions). 

Most of my childhood friends knew how to handle guns at a young age.  I remember target shooting when I was eight or nine years old.  Everybody took hunter’s safety courses after school and I did too even though I’ve never hunted.   I think the biggest difference between attitudes about guns at that time compared to current times is respect.   My childhood friends and I would never have dreamed of playing with guns because they are dangerous. In fact toy guns were strictly forbidden from my household, no squirt guns, or cap guns allowed, we weren’t even supposed to point our finger at someone and say bang.   Guns were never treated as toys.   I think this attitude made it relatively safe to own and use fire arms.       

Which (finally!) brings me to the point of this post.  We all agree that guns are dangerous.  Free speech can also be dangerous.  So isn’t the best answer to socially complicated and dangerous issues like free speech and the right to bear arms education?   Living in a free world is dangerous.  If we want to be free we have to accept the responsibility of teaching each other how to act with integrity and personal accountability.  We need to educate our children about the dangers and teach them how to keep themselves safe.  I’m considering presenting an internet course at the library for young people about how to keep themselves safe when accessing the web.  Any suggestions?

 

2nd Amendment Rights Thursday, May 24 2007 

Librarians are especially concerned about 1st Amendment Rights to free speech.  A recent news article in local paper describes two teens who are exercising their 2nd Amendment Right to bear arms. Two brothers in
Post Falls Idaho are openly carrying loaded guns everywhere they go.   The boys are 18 and 15 years old and in
Idaho it’s legal for those over 18 to carry guns and for those 13-17 to carry a rifle with a parent’s permission.   The boys are carrying the guns to demonstrate that they have the right to.     

 

What interests me about this issue is the range of perspectives regarding this right.  Unlike the First Amendment which I support wholeheartedly my personal feeling about the right to bear arms are mixed.  I wonder if we still live in world that is stable enough to allow 15 year old boys to walk around with loaded guns.   Which makes me realize that citizens can easily ask the same question regarding free speech, do we live in a world that’s stable enough to allow people in public libraries to access anything that is legal on the internet?  Isn’t it dangerous to allow that kind of access in a public place? 

 

I recently heard or read (I can’t remember) an analogy between First Amendment Rights and owning a swimming pool.   It goes something like this – if you own a swimming pool do you forbid your kids to use until they are over 18?  Most likely you build a wall around it to make it as safe as possible, keep an eye the kids while they use it, and teach your children to swim.  I’m not sure how well this analogy works for 2nd Amendment Rights – but clearly a great deal of the responsibility for keeping our world safe falls to personal accountability.  

 

One link to the article – http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1836770/posts

 

Worldwide Internet Censorship Sunday, May 20 2007 

Lately I’ve read a few articles about worldwide internet censorship.   This article Net censorship spreads worldwide  http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4973114.stm   By Mark Ward, is interesting.  It discusses censorship and the fact that many countries are now censoring internet access.  The information in the article is based on a report by Reporters Without Borders.  It states that
China is considered the biggest censor and jailer of dissidents who publish on-line.  Many countries “including Burma, Cuba, Iran, Libya, Nepal, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkmenistan, and
Vietnam censor the net.”   

According to this a Wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_the_People’s_Republic_of_China

Internet censorship in
China is still strongly focused on political information however restrictions on sexually orientated information have recently become somewhat more relaxed.   According to this article, government censorship in
China is inconsistent and fairly easy to circumvent.  A software project designed by the University of Toronto’s Citizen lab and called Psiphon[23] (wikipedia)    “is a circumvention technology that works through social networks of trust and is designed to help Internet users bypass content-filtering systems set up by governments, such as China, North Korea, Iran, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and others.”  (wikipedia)   
 

It’s interesting that the internet has become part of the power play to control how people think and what they know.  The Ward article quotes “Julien Pain – who heads the internet freedom desk at the RSF…”  It states that “Mr Pain said the world’s dictators have not remained powerless in the face of the explosion of online content. By contrast, many have been “efficient and inventive” in using the net to spy on citizens and censor debate.” 

 

I also came across a link to a Handbook for Bloggers  and Cyber-Dissidents (2005) by Reporters Without Borders, with articles like How to Blog Anomalously, by Ethan Zuckerman, and How to Get Round Censorship by Nart Villeneuve.  I find it interesting that there are often counterbalances to censorship.  Information is valuable and people will find ways to share and learn.  I’ve gained not only a greater respect for
America’s First Amendment protection of free speech but also a more protective attitude toward it.   I now understand what a valuable and precarious right it is. 

 

The value of conflict Sunday, May 13 2007 

Thinking about intellectual challenges as ethical dilemmas reminds me how important conflict can be to society.  I feel more composed dealing with the conflict sounding intellectual challenges when I remember that the other point of view is a valid version of truth.  Sometimes the discussions surrounding the conflict are as important as the issues themselves.  It’s difficult for librarians to be on the frontlines of this social debate but the resulting discussions are important because our participation makes the issues surrounding intellectual freedom more accessible to individuals.  And the consequences of the debate make a difference in people’s day-to-day lives.  Following are quotes about conflict from Wikiqoute that help clarify what I’ve been thinking. On Conflict… 

People aren’t either wicked or noble. They’re like chef’s salads, with good things and bad things chopped and mixed together in vinaigrette of confusion and conflict. -Lemony Snicket/A Series of Unfortunate Events 

“Force against force rarely accomplishes anything.” “Conflict is inevitable in life. Do not run from it–embrace it instead.” Tristan J. Loo is an American author and expert on conflict resolution and peace-keeping 

Ethics is not just an abstract intellectual discipline. It is about the conflicts that arise in trying to meet real human needs and values.John Ziman (May 16, 1925January 2, 2005) was a scientist, and later a philosopher specialising in the philosophy of science 

In order to properly understand the big picture, everyone should fear becoming mentally clouded and obsessed with one small section of truth.  Xun ZiChinese philosopher and Confucian thinker 

“Rest assured, there are no utopias and conflict will not go away in the future. If life became too easy, we would lose our motivation to move forward. However, we have an opportunity now to move into an era with a far better grade of conflict, with problem sets that are infinitely more interesting.”   Thomas Frey (born May 9, 1954) Executive Director and Senior Futurist at the DaVinci Institute.  

 

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.